When Safari says it blocks or prevents a tracker, what it means is that the ITP algorithm has flagged some domain as having cross-site tracking capabilities, and Safari has, among other things, stripped it of its capabilities to carry cookies in cross-site requests, also known as third-party cookies. I've tried Safari 14 (on macOS Big Sur), and tested the behaviour of GA vs Safari 13.1, and didn't immediately see any noticeable difference, other than v14 reports domains on which ITP blocked cookies. Similarly, Tom Anthony contributed to the research: Safari now all the 3rd-party domain trackers on the website 1/3 /2RLOOmffZl- Maciek Stanasiuk ? June 24, 2020 In the initial release of macOS Big Sur it looks like the new features in #Safari are only UI-focused and nothing new than ITP 2.3 is being implemented. So and the folks, an #WWDC20 #ITP update.
That’s John Wilander, the WebKit engineer in charge of ITP saying that “ITP has not started to block resource loads, but ITP does so much more than just block cookies”.Įarly on, Maciek Stanasiuk tested whether hits are actually blocked, and found the opposite: Men ITP gör också mycket mer än begränsar/blockerar kakor som du säkert vet.- John Wilander ?? June 24, 2020 ITP har inte börjat blockera resurser från att ladda. That’s not how Intelligent Tracking Prevention(ITP) works. Subscribe to the Simmer newsletter to get the latest news and content from Simo Ahava into your email inbox!
NOTE! Search Engine Journal has added a footnote that they might have got the story wrong.